Introduction
This checklist will assist in-house counsel and risk and compliance teams with the steps that their organisation should take when dealing with an unannounced inspection or dawn raid. It will help you to determine whether your organisation has the necessary systems in place to handle a dawn raid, explain how to manage a dawn raid and provide instructions for:
- Reception and security staff
- A senior member of your IT staff
- Management and the legal team
Steps 1 to 3 are intended to be shared with the relevant teams in your organisation in advance of a dawn raid and can be used as a reference if a raid takes place.
At the end of the document, there are explanatory notes and specific notes corresponding to the relevant step in the instructions.
Step 1 – Instructions for reception and security staff
| No. | Step | Further information |
| 1.1 | Welcome officials and contact legal team |
|
| 1.2 | Request documentation |
|
| 1.3 | Ask officials to wait |
|
| 1.4 | Record the officials’ details |
|
| 1.5 | Arrange meeting rooms |
|
| 1.6 | Maintain confidentiality and cooperation |
|
Step 2 – Instructions for a senior member of IT staff
The instructions below should be utilised by someone with sufficient seniority to understand the IT infrastructure of the organisation and with the authority to take emergency steps in respect of the organisation’s IT – for example, the head of IT or the chief technology officer. The individual(s) will need to have the authority and competence to comply with IT requests made by the officials during the raid – for example, they will need the appropriate permissions to access IT archives.
| No. | Step | Further information |
| 2.1 | Preserve documentation |
|
| 2.2 | Meet the officials |
|
| 2.3 | Set up your base |
|
| 2.4 | Assist the officials |
|
| 2.5 | Create a support team |
|
| 2.6 | Data deletion process |
|
Step 3 – Instructions for management and legal teams
Depending on your organisational structure, these instructions should be followed by your chief executive officer, managing director or other members of the senior leadership team, in addition to the head of your legal team, to the extent that you have one.
| No. | Step | Further information |
| 3.1 | Meet the officials |
|
| 3.2 | Contact internal and external legal counsel |
|
| 3.3 | Check documents |
|
| 3.4 | Check meeting rooms |
|
| 3.5 | Agree conditions |
|
| 3.6 | Assemble and brief shadowers |
|
| 3.7 | The role of shadowers |
|
| 3.8 | Identify key employees |
|
| 3.9 | Handling questions |
|
| 3.10 | Email staff |
|
| 3.11 | Seals |
|
| 3.12 | At the end of the raid |
|
Explanatory notes
Overview – who can raid your organisation and why
Several authorities have the power to conduct unannounced inspections as part of investigations into potential infringements. These include, but are not limited to:
- the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) – in respect of a suspected breach of competition law;
- Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs – in respect of a suspected tax fraud; and
- the Health and Safety Executive – in respect of suspected poor health and safety performance by a business.
Some will be investigations under civil powers, while others will be conducted under criminal powers.
You will need to carefully check the specific powers applicable in each inspection to ensure that the authority is not acting beyond its legal remit, and that your organisation’s rights of defence are adequately understood and exercised.
While each authority’s powers will differ slightly, the basic principles of how to manage the inspection remain the same.
It is recommended that an organisation seek specialist external counsel in the event of a raid, who can advise on exercising the company’s rights of defence and provide lawyers to help shadow each official. Shadowing helps to ensure that the officials do not exceed the scope of their powers and to keep track of the investigation as it unfolds.
Please note that in respect of UK competition law, in April 2023 the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill (the Bill) was introduced in the House of Commons. The Bill proposes amendments that will strengthen the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA’s) evidence-gathering powers, including in relation to dawn raids. Specifically, the Bill will:
- broaden the CMA’s power to interview individuals as part of Competition Act investigations, so that the CMA can interview any relevant person, including those not connected with the business;
- introduce a duty to preserve evidence in all Competition Act investigations 'where a person knows or suspects' that an investigation by the CMA 'is being or is likely to be carried out';
- give the CMA powers to ‘seize and sift’ evidence when it inspects domestic premises under a warrant; and
- strengthen the CMA’s powers when executing a warrant to obtain information stored remotely when it is stored electronically and is available from the premises.
In addition, the Bill will augment the CMA’s ability to impose fines on businesses and individuals for non-compliance with the CMA’s investigatory measures. Specifically, the Bill provides that:
- where a business (or any other entity) fails to comply with an investigative measure, including failing to comply with an information request, concealing, falsifying or destroying evidence and providing false or misleading information, the CMA should be able to impose fixed penalties of up to 1% of a business’ annual worldwide turnover, and have the power to impose an additional daily penalty of up to 5% of daily worldwide turnover while non-compliance continues
- where a natural person conceals, falsifies, or destroys evidence, or provides false or misleading information, the CMA should be able to impose fixed penalties of up to £30,000, as well as have the power to impose an additional daily penalty of up to £15,000 while non-compliance continues; and
The above measures are not yet in place and remain subject to further debate as the Bill goes through the parliamentary process. However, organisations should continue to monitor these developments closely and make relevant staff aware of the upcoming changes.
Notes on specific requirements
Step 1 - Instructions for reception and security staff
1.1 Welcome officials and contact legal team
Ensure that relevant dawn raid contact names and numbers are available and accessible for reception staff to use in the event of an unannounced visit. If staff do not have contact details for specialist external counsel to hand, they should contact in-house counsel and/or senior management for instructions.
1.2 Request documentation
Ensure that the authority in question provides a document authorising the inspection. This will either expressly state the powers that the authority has or refer to the piece of legislation granting the powers.
The authorisation document(s) sets out the scope of the authority’s investigation and the powers under which it is investigating. It is helpful to provide copies of the authorisation to the lawyers and company personnel involved in managing the raid/shadowing, so that they can quickly and easily check the authority’s scope and powers and challenge the authority where it is acting outside of either of them.
It is useful to obtain the mobile number of the lead official so that those involved in managing the raid from the company’s perspective can contact them easily and quickly, to update them on the company’s progress in complying with the authority’s requests, or to discuss and resolve a dispute between a shadower and an official – for example, over scope or privilege.
1.3 Ask officials to wait
While signing in the visiting officials is required, the purpose of the visit should not be recorded, as a company is usually legally obliged to keep the existence of the raid confidential, to avoid ‘tipping off’ any other relevant parties. It is in the company’s own interests to keep the raid confidential, as while it is not usually established at the time of a raid that the company has engaged in unlawful conduct (it is usually under investigation), the raid becoming public could have negative consequences for the company, such as a negative impact on share prices or supplier relations.
1.4 Record the officials’ details
Make a list of the officials and the authority they are from, to help the legal team to understand and ascertain their powers during the raid and how many additional personnel or external counsel will be needed to attend the raid.
1.5 Arrange meeting rooms
It is advisable to book three meeting rooms for the entire day. The officials conducting the raid usually want two rooms: one for IT and one as an operations room. The third room can be used by the organisation’s advisers and in-house lawyers. It is important that the rooms that the officials are using do not contain any IT, documents or other information, to ensure that the officials do not view anything without the presence of a shadower.
1.6 Maintain confidentiality and cooperation
See explanatory notes 1.3 and 3.10. All staff should be informed of the fact that the investigation is highly confidential, that they must not discuss the raid with anyone outside the company, and that they should cooperate with the officials but refer any questions to the legal team.
Step 2 - Instructions for a senior member of IT staff
2.1 Document preservation
It is important to ensure that all relevant data is preserved during the dawn raid and thereafter as an investigation develops, and to avoid the risk of employees starting to delete incriminating information.
In light of the increased use of hybrid / remote working models, organisations must consider how they ensure that staff working from home also comply with document preservation measures (and otherwise comply with any restrictions / requirements imposed by an authority during a raid).
2.2 Meet the officials and 2.3 Set up your base
The officials have extensive powers. For example, they can download data from servers and suspend individuals’ email accounts. Subject to the specific powers in respect of which the raid is taking place, there can be serious penalties for refusing legitimate requests (known as obstruction). For example, committing an offence during a CMA dawn raid is punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment, a fine or both. If you are unsure as to whether the officials have the power to request a certain action, tell the officials that you will need to check with the legal team. Do this as quickly as possible; and if there is a legitimate reason not to agree to the officials’ request (eg, if the request is outside the scope of the investigation or pertains to privileged documents), the legal team will manage this on your behalf.
2.4 Assist the officials
Occasionally, officials may ask the company to provide hard drives or other electronic equipment to assist them in collating/storing information. Companies that are subject to dawn raids are generally obliged to cooperate fully with the officials and not obstruct the raid. Companies that are found to have obstructed or refused to cooperate may be subject to serious penalties.
2.5 Create support team
An IT support team will typically comprise the IT director and other members of the IT staff who can assist with requests from officials to grant access to particular data or information stored on the client’s infrastructure.
A ‘shadower’ has the role of following the official to whom they have been assigned and taking full notes of everything they do: where they go, the questions they ask, the search terms they use, what they are – and are not – interested in etc.
Strategic issues include inputting on external or internal communications strategy.
It is important to keep a clear and comprehensive record of all requests from the officials, to ensure that these are dealt with efficiently. This also helps demonstrate to the officials that you are doing your best to cooperate fully by managing their requests in a timely manner.
It is important that the legal team are aware of any potential delays or issues in delivering the requested information, to enable them to manage the expectations of the officials accordingly. This will help to minimise the risk of the company being accused of failing to cooperate or obstructing the officials (both of which have the potential to incur significant penalties).
2.6 Deletion of data
The timeframe for the deletion of data depends on the authority and the power it is exercising. The ‘debrief’ typically happens on the day of the investigation and involves the legal team seeking feedback from all relevant IT staff about the requests they received from officials and how they were actioned, to ensure that a full audit trail is kept of all data in which the officials expressed an interest, reviewed or copied – including requests to block email accounts, access devices and so on. This audit trail is vital to help the company understand what the authority is investigating and assess whether it may need to make any subsequent legal challenges in respect of the raid (eg, about the authority acting outside the scope of its legal powers).
Step 3 - Instructions for management and legal teams
3.1 Meet the officials
It is important to emphasise the company’s commitment to cooperation, as failure to cooperate (or obstruction) can lead to potentially serious penalties – for example, in a CMA investigation, a company can be liable to pay a fixed penalty of £30,000 and a daily fine of £15,000 for failure to comply with the investigation.
It may be helpful to take at least two people with you, to assist you in keeping track of the various requests which the officials are making and/or in dealing with them.
It is important to involve legal counsel to help the company effectively defend its rights.
3.2 Contact internal and external legal counsel
You may have a sufficiently large legal team, with specialist expertise in the area of law that the officials are investigating, such that the company will not require additional external legal support. However, it is usually the case that companies require additional legal support, either to bolster the number of lawyers in attendance (for the purposes of expanding the shadowing team) or to provide specialist expertise in the area of law that the authority is investigating.
Senior managers may include heads of business units and other managers in charge of teams.
3.3 Check documents
It is important that documents are checked to ensure that the raid is conducted in accordance with the powers set out therein – for example, that the raid is being conducted by the named officials, or that the right business and premises are being searched. If an inspection of the documents reveals any errors, these should be challenged with the assistance of legal counsel. Depending on the extent of the error, legal counsel will likely advise that the officials are allowed to continue with their raid, but that the error is noted, with an explanation to the officials that the company may bring legal challenges regarding the error following the raid. It is unlikely that legal counsel will advise that the officials be refused entry to premises on the basis of an error, as this could be viewed as obstructing the officials, which could potentially lead to very high penalties for the company.
Signing the inspection documents evidences that the documents have been handed to your organisation and is not an admission of liability.
The officials’ powers will vary according to the authorisation documents. For example, some authorities will have the power to remove original documents, whereas others may only have the power to take photocopies or review data on site.
In practice, recent experience is that officials increasingly require organisations to identify and provide them with specific categories of information or documents, rather than conducting a search over all of an organisation’s data themselves.
3.4 Check meeting rooms
Officials will need at least one other room in which they can set up their IT equipment to carry out IT searches and/or to conduct searches of hard-copy files. Ensure that shadowers accompany officials into this room (there should be one shadower per official). See also Overview and 2.5 Role of the shadowers.
3.5 Agree conditions
The officials may request a meeting, although this may not happen in all raids. Sometimes the officials will request a meeting to explain where they will start their investigation.
You may allow officials to station themselves around the building, provided that each official is accompanied by a shadower.
3.6 Assemble and brief shadowers and 3.7 The role of shadowers
The shadowers will need to understand the scope of the investigation from the documentation provided by the officials and from briefings by the legal team or senior management.
The officials will understand that the company must exercise its rights of defence and will thus fully expect to be shadowed by company representatives.
Explain to the shadowers that while it is important to raise challenges on scope and/or privilege, any disagreement with an official on those issues should be escalated to the lead lawyer (on behalf of the company) and the lead official to resolve separately. This helps to minimise the risk that the company may appear to be obstructing the officials.
3.8 Identify key employees
The persons considered to be ‘key employees’ will vary from one raid to the next, but they are likely to be those employees who are most closely involved with the conduct under investigation. Initially, involve those in most senior roles as well as those most likely to be in possession of relevant evidence (ie, documentation pertaining to the subject matter of the investigation).
3.10 Email staff
Send an email to all staff, not just those directly involved in the raid, to provide a general explanation of what is happening and ensure an appropriate level of cooperation from all staff. Given that officials are likely to be able to roam freely around the premises, all staff need to understand who they are in order not to obstruct them when they are acting in accordance with their powers.
3.11 Seals
If the investigation runs into a second or subsequent day, the officials may choose to seal rooms or cabinets used to store documents to ensure that documents are not tampered with overnight. Tampering with seals can result in significant penalties (eg, in a Financial Conduct Authority raid, a person who obstructs a search warrant can be fined up to £5,000).
3.12 At the end of the raid
If the officials do not plan to return to the premises, but have removed data for review, the next steps will be to agree a process for reviewing data off-site. Officials may also follow up asking for individuals to attend interviews, and may issue formal or informal requests for further information to be provided.
You should request two copies of the list of documents the officials have reviewed and copied: one for internal purposes and one for external counsel.
Following a dawn raid, the next steps are likely to include conducting an internal investigation to review all documents or data taken; making further enquiries into the matter under investigation, including additional data searches and interviews with key individuals; and devising the company’s strategy to respond to the raid.
Requests may be made during a closing meeting during the company and the officials, or by separate written communication (depending on the authority in question).
Additional Resources
Related Lexology PRO content
How-to guides:
Understanding the Competition Act 1998 prohibitions
How to identify and prioritise competition law risk in your organisation
How to design a competition law compliance programme
How to implement a culture of compliance with competition law in your organisation
How to assess competition law risks in an agency agreement
How to identify and remediate competition law infringements
Understanding the National Security and Investment Act 2021
Checklists:
Competition law compliance
Meeting with a competitor
Conducting a competition compliance audit
Responding to an information request from the Competition and Markets Authority
Determining whether to file a National Security and Investment Act 2021 notification
Quick views:
Penalties for failure to comply with the CMA’s Competition Act 1998 investigatory powers
Penalties for failure to comply with the CMA’s markets investigatory powers
Penalties for failure to comply with the CMA’s mergers investigatory powers
Penalties for failure to comply with the CMA’s mergers interim measures powers
Director disqualification for breach of competition law
Competition law and land agreements
National Security and Investment Act 2021 case tracker
Reliance on information posted:
While we use reasonable endeavours to provide up to date and relevant materials, the materials posted on our site are not intended to amount to advice on which reliance should be placed. They may not reflect recent changes in the law and are not intended to constitute a definitive or complete statement of the law. You may use them to stay up to date with legal developments but you should not use them for transactions or legal advice and you should carry out your own research. We therefore disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on such materials by any visitor to our site, or by anyone who may be informed of any of its contents.